Saturday, December 23, 2017

"Second Hand Time" by Svetlana Alexievich"

Could truth be second hand? If time could be second hand then the truth of that time could be second hand as well. This line of thought is really complicated, but not for those who have experienced those times or those truths. Because then, it becomes a matter of making peace with either this or that. In between this and that there are a million stories which either have the luxury of sadness coming out of intense love or a senseless, ugly death or an amputated life. The people in the stories collected by Svetlana Alexievich are not fictional but they either have been or still are extreme romanticists. This romance is curated till it takes a life of its own.  Where did the creation of myth start and why did it suddenly fade away giving immense room to some expectation? That is the story of USSR in this book where people are cogs of giant machinery and its glory, and suddenly the machine is dismantled and the cogs are left to think for themselves, total strangers to each other.

                                      Identities are changed in an instant, the myth is changed overnight; centre of power is moved from an idea to a deep sense of personal ugliness or fairness. Suddenly the tribes are there, nationalities are there, God is there and Satan is there. All of them in people because they are the tribes, nationalities, Gods or Satan. This work would not fit into any category of fiction and non-fiction because these are people telling their own stories, their own perceptions and their own truths. Truth, even repetitive is not boring. There is love, immense love in this book. 

Monday, December 18, 2017

जानते हुए ...





जानते हुए 



दूर किनारों की सच्चाई 

यहाँ से कैसे दिखे ?


लबालब रहता है 

गलतफ़हमियों का समंदर ,

तैर के जाने की 

फ़ुरसत किसे ?



बहुत हौसला चाहिए 

किसी को 

पूरी तरह से 

जानने के लिए...

                                                             
                                                                    - मायाराम 

Saturday, September 16, 2017

मंटो के नाम , मंटो की ज़ुबान.


बम्बई की गलियों की किस्सा फ़रोशी
अमृतसर से शुरू हुई 
लाहौर में खत्म न हो सकी,
कलम चलती रही 
बेशरम हरामजादी,

शराब के दौर, चाय की चुस्कियां
सिग्रेट के कश,
कुछ आज भी 
नाक़ाबिल ए बर्दाश्त हैं 
इस आदमी के गश,

आवारागर्दी पसंद है इसे 
सड़कछापों का नुमाइन्दा है, 
बलवों की लाशों को इसने 
कागज़ पे उठाया है ,

खाकिस्तरी आसमां इसका 
अब ज़र्द हो गया है 
 कितने अफ़साने उगते होंगे 
जहां मंटो गया है ...
                                                            - मायाराम




किस्सा फ़रोशी - कहानी बेचना 
गश - घाव 
बलवे - दंगे - फ़साद
खाकिस्तरी - मिटटी के रंग का 
ज़र्द - पीला 

Saturday, September 9, 2017

"A Brief History of Seven Killings" by Marlon James

If a man is sitting in a chair in the middle of a hall which is carpeted and there are three dozen people of both genders and multiple ethnicities who are dancing around trying to tell him their version of an event simultaneously, then I am that man and these people belong to Marlon James’ “A Brief History of Seven Killings”. They are not exiting the hall, some of them are taking a break to copulate, some are drawing cutlasses and enacting a scene, a few are going to the windows drawing their pistols and shooting someone on the road five floors down, some are sniffing cocaine and some just stay back and stare at me from time to time demanding my undivided attention. Everyone and everything lacks something, of which they are not aware and there is something always left to tell you because either the upbringing was such or this is too much fun. It transforms from almost magical realism to the pace of Mario Puzo as you turn the pages. The metaphysical is almost always in range without hinting it's reality. The people who have been just shot on the road are climbing up the stairs and standing behind those who have shot them, but it is not haunting because it is “A Brief History of Those Seven Killings”. All the research that has gone into the novel is buried under the trash hills of Jamaica. On those hills are loitering these characters who are fully armed with machine guns, glocks and their immediate realities. So, one is not going to find that the work is inspired by real events, and if one is able to, it will be buried under the next round of excitement that comes with every chapter or the next round of the trash truck. Read it if you don’t mind Jamaican tongue. It will even take you to Brooklyn. 

Friday, September 1, 2017

Impermanence

If impermanence would not be a philosophical question it would just be about consistency in losing something or someone from time to time. Instead of being the means to justify a worldly loss which in turn compliments a gain in other realms of this universe, impermanence would be a plain reality that could be taught and made understood in schools and colleges. So much justification for the truth that everything perishes, points to our escapism.  If loss could be a subject from the primaries then for sure our society is not going to produce more Buddhas but it may just stop a lot of us to go on hoarding the tangible and intangible in our lives. Reading Kabir’s poetry on impermanence is about translating it and answering the question in a Hindi examination. If we could tackle it in a direct manner without the burden of grades, it may help more, since so much effort is already invested in beating around the bush. After all there must be a reason that in the trains everyone is polite to each other and extra caring just when the journey is about to end, that news of a death relieves all of us a bit in our depths and the last hour in classrooms is always more excited than the first. The chapter on impermanence could just deflate the mystery around it, making every growing student understand that the end will approach everyone and everything equally, so there is no need to rush it by playing the “Blue Whale Challenge”. Instead, the real challenge and the beauty is generosity and boldness in this life before it fades away. 

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin

In our age eccentricity has more coins in its kitty than the normalcy of a person who believes in buying vegetables at a cheaper rate. Eccentrics are genius so why should they bother about potatoes! Eccentricity may not be over rated but it is celebrated more in our times. It is almost like being an an ambition in itself with the coolest motto which goes ‘’I don’t care’’!!
Are we ruining the simplicity of things? Every parent is naming the kid so difficult to pronounce that the child’s name is equal to the coolness of their parents. Yes, that nod when one tells that his son’s name is Priyavardhandev and then the surname off course.

Benjamin Franklin becomes a favorite because he is a genius who is not an eccentric. He talks from saving a penny to the making of nations. He is a leading author, printer, political theorist,renowned polymath, politician, postmaster, scientist, inventor, civic activist, statesman, a diplomat and the first American. So it must not be a bad thing to care a bit for everyone around us. I don’t mind Charles Bukowski’s poems but it is nice to read an autobiography of a man who did simple things again and again, whose identity is deeds done by him and not his personal resolves and vows which become the hallmark of so many of our greats. His autobiography is not complete, it starts with a calm and leaves you midway without being abrupt, no wonder he was the first United States ambassador to France. Not once one realizes that he or she is reading the words of one of the grandest personas of our history. Simplicity of his days and writing is something which is difficult to find even in the autobiography of Mahatma Gandhi. “My Experiments with Truth” is full of his aura. Benjamin Franklin does not hammer any grand principles but he does his part everywhere he is. His realities are the perfect edit of a movie to convey the thought and the inspiration followed by decisive action. A married man with kids who cares for society and acts for it. Lovely. 

Sunday, May 14, 2017

"Demons of Discipline"

Singularity of the word becomes baffling for the serial offenders of discipline, eaten up by their guilt for not sticking to it but always carrying the ambition to stick to it. So, is it important to be disciplined? Or its monotony jeopardizes the creativity of every act once you have repeated it for a week in the name of discipline.  It’s the elephant in the room and that room could belong to an athlete, a politician or a writer. They all talk of the importance of it, battle lines are drawn between sleeping hours and sleepers, between gyms and potential fitness, even between a Buddha and the enlightenment in the lighter sense of the word. Once you have noticed the elephant and taken it seriously, it is going to ram you against the wall until you ride it and riding it on a daily basis could be the biggest ambition of the entire mankind and womankind. To refuse to eat those golden french fries dipped in red tomato sauce, a match seems to be made in heaven, could be the toughest task an Adam or Eve could face looking at their history with a healthy apple.
In the era of internet and you tube this beast has grown to an extraordinary size because constantly we are more and more aware of the competition and resultant comparison in every wake of life as the smallest achievement can be shared, flaunted and sold at a price tag that depends on the common sense of the reader or the viewer and how seriously they take the information or how well do they know themselves. And then, everything related to discipline could be bifurcated in to doing few things and absolutely not doing the others. You have to get up early so you should not remain awake till late. You have to exercise to be fit and not eat sugar. You have to sit and write this column and not check your phone or you tube to write it well. Every distraction comes so cheap and handy that it requires an iron will to stick to anything and that makes it some sort of achievement. Hence the facebook pages are full of celebrations about beginnings which seldom accomplish anything and those hundred likes which are marks of reciprocation almost all the time, do nothing to help.
“Whatever distracts is evil” says Kafka. So it could all be the work of Devil himself, otherwise why would someone knock at your door with a box full of sweets just when you have quit eating high calorie food items or your close friends whom you can’t refuse anything would invite you for a late night party just when you have resolved to get up early in the morning. The devil must have appointed a special set of demons dedicated to derail the divinity which discipline could invoke. How split up we are in a constant state of torment, bingeing on all sorts of ideas of fitness and perfection which are in air with all the distractions. Only if there was no choice in lots of matters, like a car which runs on petrol has no option to be on diesel. As much as having no choice sounds immoral in today’s day and age, in certain matters it could work miracles. If we had no choice of putting the alarm to snooze, if we had no choice but to practice our craft each day, if we had no choice but to have those holidays once in an year. It all starts from there, because after struggling with routine day and night we reach at some deep understanding about certain activities which then become the most important, leaving no choice to be careless regarding them.

After all there is no choice once one knows that one has to reach office by ten. There is terror about this and not understanding. But thinking and understanding the depth of few things or activities could work as holy water against these Demons which we all need to exorcise.  

Thursday, May 4, 2017

"The Age of Reason" - Jean Paul Sartre

The age of reason is 35. How abstract this could be is how precise it is for Mathieu. When your priorities start to become clearer to yourself, there is more chance of one saying no to any proposal rather than agreeing to it because may be it would bring a minor alteration to one’s schedule which more or less signifies the whole of the Age of Reason. To be married or to not to be married so that the same flesh keeps smelling differently, so that those fluids are still sacred which are exchanged in the name of excitement. It is not exactly Jean Paul Sartre is saying but that is how this reader’s interpretation is. Love could be without rhyme or reason so no surprises there, but love could just prolong itself for the seemingly indefinite time till it can’t last anymore because the circumstances are not comfortable enough for the fluids to smell good. Those streets of Paris don’t have much character but those heads have, they are full of Paris and so many other things. We go on, is another interpretation of this reader because we are not left with much choice. Motivation is just like a wave and those gravels of time which it brings forth are coincidental, which are responsible for mood swings because we humans are good at calculating and concluding randomness to fit in to our daily designs of thought and resultant existence. Yes, the thought is our existence without philosophizing it too much. That, I feel Jean Paul Sartre says between the lines.
                                                                       Keep living is not the same thing as keep existing. Now, which is lesser of the two is what Marcelle’s dilemma is and it is not universal, because her concern is not universal when she is trying to matter to herself and the result could be a new life inside her which in some time will try to matter on its own. Ivich is most of us, trying to close eyes but tickled by life, and she is trying to sleep instead of laughing because she is 23 after all and not reaching the age of reason soon enough. She is despondent in her head because she has to be so, juggling hours at various places in Paris at the same time because there is little time and no criteria to judge her judgement.  Off course there is wickedness in Daniel, source of which requires attention from him. He is so much like Marcelle but hides it so much better for nothing in particular because in the end everyone is exposed to Mathieu, including himself, helping his idea of freedom and may be sabotaging it at the same time. Boris is like Ivich just that he loves Mathieu more. His naiveness is dangerous and purposeful like naiveness is most of the time. Rest can do without a mention. It is Jean Paul Sartre work, juicy, stimulating and abstract till it takes a very specific shape and then retains it forever in a reader’s head.